Ester Industries Ltd. Through: None v. Commissioner Of Income Tax Vi
High Court
12 Sep 2017 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Ester Industries Ltd. Through: None v. Commissioner Of Income Tax Vi
Date of order
12 Sep 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Ester Industries Ltd. Through: None v. Commissioner Of Income Tax Vi, the High Court (2017) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
$~R52
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ ITA 270/2005
ESTER INDUSTRIES LTD. Through: None. Versus
..... Appellant
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Asheesh Jain, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Vikrant A. Maheshwari, Advocate.
CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH
O R D E R% 27.07.2017
1. In the order dated 31[st] August, 2006 framing the substantial questions of law, the Court noted that a regular assessment has already been made under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘Act’) and an appeal in that regard was pending before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (‘ITAT’).
2. Mr. Asheesh Jain, the learned Senior Standing Counsel for the Revenue, states that he shall seek instructions on the status of said appeal before the ITAT. At his request, list on 12[th] September, 2017 in the category of ‘After Notice Miscellaneous Matters’.
S. MURALIDHAR, J
JULY 27, 2017/‘anb’
PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.