Even Date Passed In I.t.a v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Chandigarh.”
High Court
11 Jul 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Even Date Passed In I.t.a v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Chandigarh.”
Date of order
11 Jul 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Even Date Passed In I.t.a v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Chandigarh.”, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OK PUNJAB AND HARYANA.AT CHANDIGARH
I.T.A. No. 379 of 2011 (O&M)
Date of Decision: 11.07.2018
Ramesh Kumar Dudani
....... Appellant
)"*%+%
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Chandigarh and another
......Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL.HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN.
Present:Mrs. Radhika Suri, Senior Advocate withMr. Manpreet Singh Kanda, Advocatefor the appellant.
Mrs. Urvashi Dhugga, Senior Standing counselfor the revenue-respondents.
AVNEESH JHINGAN, J.
For order, see detailed reasons recorded in a separate order of
even date passed in I.T.A. No. 194 of 2010, titled as “Ramesh KumarDudani Versus The Commissioner of Income Tax, Chandigarh.”
(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL)
JUDGE
11.07.2018
*""0
(AVNEESH JHINGAN)JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasonedWhether Reportable:
Yes/NoYes/No
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue