Even Date Passed In I.t.a v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Chandigarh.”
High Court
11 Jul 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Even Date Passed In I.t.a v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Chandigarh.”
Date of order
11 Jul 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Even Date Passed In I.t.a v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Chandigarh.”, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OK PUNJAB AND HARYANA.AT CHANDIGARH
I.T.A. No. 223 of 2012 (O&M)
Date of Decision: 11.07.2018
Ramesh Kumar Dudani
....... Appellant
( )#*#
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Chandigarh and another
......Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL.HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN.
Present:Mrs. Radhika Suri, Senior Advocate withMr. Manpreet Singh Kanda, Advocatefor the appellant.
Mrs. Urvashi Dhugga, Senior Standing counselfor the revenue-respondents.
AVNEESH JHINGAN, J.
For order, see detailed reasons recorded in a separate order of
even date passed in I.T.A. No. 194 of 2010, titled as “Ramesh KumarDudani Versus The Commissioner of Income Tax, Chandigarh.”
(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL)
JUDGE
11.07.2018
TeeMa
(AVNEESH JHINGAN)JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasonedWhether Reportable:
Yes/NoYes/No
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue