Case LawHigh Court › Exemptions v. Mar Thoma Syrian Church

Exemptions v. Mar Thoma Syrian Church

High Court 22 Aug 2006 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Exemptions v. Mar Thoma Syrian Church
Date of order
22 Aug 2006
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Exemptions v. Mar Thoma Syrian Church, the High Court (2006) dismissed the appeal.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 450 OF 2004 The Director of Income-tax (Exemptions) .. Appellant V/s Mar Thoma Syrian Church .. Respondent Mr.Sharma for the Appellant. CORAM : H.L. GOKHALE & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATE : 22ND AUGUST 2006 P.C. P.C. : P.C. 1. Heard Mr.Sharma in support of this appeal. 2. The appeal seeks to challenge the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 4th August 2003 concerning the assessment of the Respondent Church for the year 1993-94. Mr.Sharma has raised two points. Firstly, he submitted that a document in the nature of receipt issued to a donor was filed during the course of the proceedings in the Tribunal. His submission is that it should not have been permitted. The second submission of Mr.Sharma is that a separate permission was necessary to justify the building fund which the Respondent had started and for that he relied upon a - 2 - Shreeram Religious & judgment of the Apex Court in Shreeram Religious & Shreeram Religious & Charitable Trust v. C.I.T. - 233 I.T.R. 53. As far Charitable Trust v. C.I.T. - 233 I.T.R. 53 Charitable Trust v. C.I.T. - 233 I.T.R. 53 as the first part is concerned, the fact remains that the necessary receipt was produced in the Tribunal. Strict rules of evidence cannot be brought in while looking into the proceeding of a quasi-judicial authority. As far as the permission for the particular fund is concerned, the Respondent had an earmarked fund of capital nature known as "Silver Jubilee Fund" and for extension of the school building of the Respondent that donation was being collected. In our view, there is no reason to interfere with the order passed by the Tribunal. Appeal is dismissed. (H.L. GOKHALE, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan