Case LawHigh Court › Express Hotels Pvt. Ltd v. Commissioner...

Express Hotels Pvt. Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

High Court 19 Feb 2004 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Express Hotels Pvt. Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax
Date of order
19 Feb 2004
Assessment year(s)
1981-82
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Express Hotels Pvt. Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, the High Court (2004) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- EXPRESS HOTELS PVT.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 6 of 1992 For Approval and Signature: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH and HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- EXPRESS HOTELS PVT. LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. INCOME TAX REFERENCE No. 6 of 1992 NOTICE SERVED for Petitioner No. 1 MR MANISH R BHATT for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH and HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL Date of decision: 19/02/2004 ORAL JUDGEMENT (Per : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH) �In this reference at the instance of the assessee under Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the following question is referred for our opinion for assessment year 1981-82 :- "Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the appellant Company, as Hotel, is an "Industrial Undertaking" eligible for the grant of Investment Allowance ?" 2.�When this reference is called out for hearing, no one appears for the applicant-assessee. Mr Manish R Bhatt, learned standing counsel appears for the revenue. 3.�Mr Bhatt states that the controversy raised in this reference is covered by the decision of the Apex Court in CIT vs Anand Theatres, (2000) 244 ITR 192. 4.�We find that apart from the assessee not having caused any appearance on its behalf though the reference is made at its instance, the paper book is not filed. Hence, we decline to answer the question. �The reference accordingly stands disposed of. ����(M.S. Shah, J.) ����(M.C. Patel, J.)� sundar/-
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan