Express Hotels Pvt. Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax
High Court
19 Feb 2004 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Express Hotels Pvt. Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax
Date of order
19 Feb 2004
Assessment year(s)
1981-82
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Express Hotels Pvt. Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, the High Court (2004) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- EXPRESS HOTELS PVT.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 6 of 1992
For Approval and Signature:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH
and
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL
============================================================
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO
to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO
of the judgement?
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO
of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution
of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals?
--------------------------------------------------------------
EXPRESS HOTELS PVT. LTD.
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
--------------------------------------------------------------
Appearance:
1. INCOME TAX REFERENCE No. 6 of 1992
NOTICE SERVED for Petitioner No. 1
MR MANISH R BHATT for Respondent No. 1
--------------------------------------------------------------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH
and
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL
Date of decision: 19/02/2004
ORAL JUDGEMENT
(Per : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH)
�In this reference at the instance of the assessee
under Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the
following question is referred for our opinion for
assessment year 1981-82 :-
"Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the appellant Company, as Hotel, is an "Industrial Undertaking" eligible for the grant
of Investment Allowance ?" 2.�When this reference is called out for hearing, no one appears for the applicant-assessee. Mr Manish R Bhatt, learned standing counsel appears for the revenue. 3.�Mr Bhatt states that the controversy raised in this reference is covered by the decision of the Apex Court in CIT vs Anand Theatres, (2000) 244 ITR 192.
4.�We find that apart from the assessee not having
caused any appearance on its behalf though the reference is made at its instance, the paper book is not filed. Hence, we decline to answer the question.
�The reference accordingly stands disposed of.
����(M.S. Shah, J.)
����(M.C. Patel, J.)�
sundar/-
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.