Case Law › High Court › Extrusion Processes Pvt.ltd v. The Commi...

Extrusion Processes Pvt.ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax City Ix, Mumbai

High Court 21 Mar 2006 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

21 Mar 2006

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In Extrusion Processes Pvt.ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax City Ix, Mumbai, the High Court (2006) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORIGINAL SIDE NOTICE OF MOTION NO.679 OF 2006IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODGING) NO.246 OF 2006 Extrusion Processes Pvt.Ltd.vs.The Commissioner of Income TaxCity IX, Mumbai. Appellant Respondent Mr.B.Amin for the applicant. None for the respondent. P.C. CORAM: R. M. LODHA &J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. DATED: 21st March, 2006 of two days. The respondent has been served with the notice of motion but none appears to oppose. 3. Delay in filing the appeal is condoned. 4. Notice of motion is granted. 5. The office is directed to process the appeal andpost it for admission as soon as numbered. (R.M.LODHA,J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR,J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.