Fa No: 1 Of 2023 v. Raghu Ram

i H]GH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY,THE TWENry SIXTH DAY OF APRILTWO THOUSAND AND TWENry THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYANANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI WRIT PETITION NO: 11650 OF 2023 Between: 9T!.-Sr.!ia!ha [Kusuma, ][Aged about ][28 ][years, ][Wo. ][Srinivas ][Kusuma. 4-10l2,]4-'10l3, Pakhala Road, Nasampet, Warahgal - 506132, Telangana State. ...PETITIONER AND The lncome Tax Officer,.Ward - 1, 3rd Floor, Mayuri Complex, Opp. TSNpDCL: Bhavan, Nakkalagutta, Hanamkonda, Warangal SOOOO1. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the Fligh court may bepleased to pass an order or direction, especially one in the nature of WRli OFMANDAMUS holding that the order passed by Respondent uis.148A(d) of theAct, dt.30.03.2023 with DIN.ITBA/AST/Ft14gAt2O22-23t1O51702199(.1 ) and thenotice dated 30.03.2023 issued under section 148 of the Act withDlN.lrBA/AST/sl148-112022-231't051707148(1) for the assessment year 2016-'t7, as being illegal, arbitrary and passed in gross violation of principles of naturaljustice without application of mind, and consequenfly set aside the same fA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under section 151 cPc praying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased tosuspend the operation of the notice issued by the Respondent u/s.14g of the Act,dt.30.03.2023 for the assessment yeat 2016'17 withDIN.ITBA/AST/51148_112022-2311051707148(1) and ail consequentiatproceedings thereto Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. A. V. RAGHU RAM Counsel for the Respondents: SRl. J. V. PRASAD (SC FOR INCOME TAX) The Court made the following: ORDER I TIIE HAN tI,E TIIE [(]I{IEFJUS'LI-CE]ALBUYANAf{D THE HON'BLE SRI IUSTICE N.TUKARAMIIW.P.No.11 650 of 2023 ORDER1?et [thc ][t ][lot.'hl ][rhe ][Lhi.J ]ltttir [t.'Ji ][li Bl,ryan)] Heard \Ir. ,\.\r.llagh r-rta rn. lcuncd counsel for the penuoncr and tr{r. J.V.Prasad. learned Standrng [( ]-ounsel, Income [-I'ax ]Department forthc rcspondenr 2. Bl trJrng rhrs pcrinon rrrrrlcr .\rriclc 226 of thc Consdruuon oflndia, pcrrtroner has assarlt rl lcgalirr and validitv of thc [()rdcr]darcd 30.03,2023 pesscd b), thc responclent under Scction 148r\(d) of theLrcomc ['l'ax ]-\ct. 1961 (bncflr 'thc .\ct' hcreinafter) for the assessrnentyca.r 2016-201.1 3. .\fter hcarrng thc urattcnt sornc length, Icarncd counsel for thcpetitioncr -"celis lcave to wrlhclm\r thc writ petiuon 4. In r.reu, of the above. writ pcution is dismisscd on withdrawalN() cos ts Asase qqe,l . miscellancorrs Pcnuons, endrng if any, stand closed- SD/. K. AMMAJIASSISTANT REGISTRASECTlON OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To,. 2. 1 One CC 9"" cD CC copiesto to sRt. SRt. J. A. v V. RAGHU PRASAD (SC FOR RAM, Advocate rruCijrrirE tOpUClrnx) topuclJii GJPw HIGH COURT DATED:2610412023 ) .s-\ ORDER WP.No.11650 of 2023 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS