Fa/822/1992 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax Bombay v. Uttamlal Chimanlal Kapari
High Court
11 Oct 2004 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newas
Parties
Fa/822/1992 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax Bombay v. Uttamlal Chimanlal Kapari
Date of order
11 Oct 2004
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Fa/822/1992 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax Bombay v. Uttamlal Chimanlal Kapari, the High Court (2004) decided the matter.
Decision: Accordingly, this Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the said order.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE
FIRST APPEAL NO.822 OF 1992
------------------------------------:-----------------------------------
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of : Court’s or Judge’s orders.
coram, appearances, Court’s orders :
or directions and Registrar’s :
orders. :
------------------------------------:------------------------------------
Mr.K.K.Tated, AGP for Appellant.
Mr.G.A.Tambe for Respondent.
----
CORAM : S.B. MHASE &
R.S. MOHITE, JJ.
DATED : 11th October 2004
P.C. :
1. The similar Appeals
involving more or less similar
facts and identical issues have
already been disposed of by the
Division Bench presided over by
Justice V.G.Palshikar vide order
dated 1.4.2003 in First Appeal
No.100 of 1988. In this view of
the matter, learned Counsel
appearing for the Appellant
brought to our notice the order
dated 1.4.2003 and requested that
this Appeal may be disposed of in
terms of this order. Accordingly,
this Appeal stands disposed of in
terms of the said order. The said
order reads as under:-
. " These appeals challenge
the order passed by the Court
below under Section 269 of the
Income Tax Act. During the
pendency of these appeals, the
Central Legislation has deleted
the provision of Section 269(c)
from the Statute Book. In that
view of the matter, nothing
survives in all these appeals.
They are accordingly disposed of.
. Copy of this order be kept
in all appeals."
(R.S.MOHITE, J.) (S.B.MHASE, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.