Case LawHigh Court › Fag Kugelfscher Georg Schafer Ag v. Depu...

Fag Kugelfscher Georg Schafer Ag v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 16 Feb 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Fag Kugelfscher Georg Schafer Ag v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
16 Feb 2021
Assessment year(s)
1993-94
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Fag Kugelfscher Georg Schafer Ag v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.

Decision: 7.Considering the above, we allow the appellant towithdraw the appeal.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

S.S.Kilaje IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYO.O.C.J. INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.339 OF 2003 FAG Kugelfscher Georg Schafer AG..Appellant Versus Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax..Respondent ................... Mr. M. Bajpai i/b. Crawford Bayley & Co., Advocate for theAppellant. Mr. M. Bajpai i/b. Crawford Bayley & Co., Advocate for theAppellant. Mr. Suresh Kumar, Advocate for the Respondent.Mr. Suresh Kumar, Advocate for the Respondent. ................... CORAM : UJJAL BHUYAN & MILIND N. JADHAV, JJ. DATE : FEBRUARY 16, 2021. P.C.: Heard Mr. Bajpai, learned counsel for the appellant andMr. Suresh Kumar, learned counsel for the respondent. 2.This appeal under section 260A of the Income TaxAct,1961 has been preferred by the assessee as the appellantagainst the order dated 30.10.2002 passed by the IncomeTax Appellate Tribunal, 'B' Bench, Mumbai in I.T.A.No.9689/MUM/1995 for the assessment year 1993-94. 3.The appeal was admitted by this Court on 15.10.2004on the substantial question of law framed in the said order. 4.Today the appeal is before us on a praecipe fled bylearned counsel for the appellant. 5.It is submitted that Parliament has enacted the DirectTax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020 (briefy 'the Act' hereinafter)providing for a scheme for resolution of tax disputes.Appellant has fled a declaration under section 3 of the saidAct before the Designated Authority which has thereafterissued a certifcate under section 5(1) of the said Actdetermining the amount of tax payable by the appellant.However, for passing of the fnal order under section 5(2) ofthe said Act, appellant is required to withdraw the appeal interms of section 4(3) thereof. Hence, the prayer forwithdrawal of the appeal. 6.Learned counsel for the respondent has no objection tothe prayer made for withdrawal of the appeal. 7.Considering the above, we allow the appellant towithdraw the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is disposed ofas withdrawn. 8.Refund as per Rules. [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] [ UJJAL BHUYAN, J. ] RavindraDigitally signedby Ravindra M.M.AmberkarAmberkarDate: 2021.02.1711:28:15 +0530
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan