Case LawHigh Court › Federal Express Corporation, Usa v. Assi...

Federal Express Corporation, Usa v. Assistant Director Of Income Tax (International Taxation) And Others

High Court 10 Mar 2010 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newas
Parties
Federal Express Corporation, Usa v. Assistant Director Of Income Tax (International Taxation) And Others
Date of order
10 Mar 2010
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Federal Express Corporation, Usa v. Assistant Director Of Income Tax (International Taxation) And Others, the High Court (2010) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1927 OF 2010 Federal Express Corporation, USA..Petitioner. Vs.Assistant Director of Income Tax(International Taxation) and others..Respondents. .... Mr. Porus Kaka with Mr. Manish Kamath, Mr. Chirag Mody i/b DSK Legal for the Petitioner.Ms. Suchitra Kamble i/b Mr. Suresh Kumar for the Respondents. .... CORAM : DR. D.Y.CHANDRACHUD & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. P.C.: 10[th] March, 2010. Leave granted to re-present the Petition on the Original Side. Registry is directed to number the Petition subject to removal of office objections. Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner and counsel appearing on behalf of the Revenue have jointly agreed to an adjournment of these proceedings until 17[th] March, 2010. It has been stated on behalf of the Revenue by the learned counsel that in the meantime no coercive steps shall be adopted by the Revenue towards recovering the demand that forms the subject matter of this Petition until the next date of hearing. (Dr. D.Y.Chandrachud, J.) (J.P. Devadhar, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan