Fetscs W.e.f. 01.10.2013 v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax-8(1
High Court
03 Feb 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Fetscs W.e.f. 01.10.2013 v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax-8(1
Date of order
03 Feb 2021
Assessment year(s)
2008-09
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Fetscs W.e.f. 01.10.2013 v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax-8(1, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.
Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is disposed of as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 394 OF 2019
FedEx Express Transportation and Supply Chain Services India Private Limited ('FETSCS') [FedEx Express Services India Private Limited merged with FETSCS w.e.f. 01.10.2013]
.. Appellant
VersusAssistant Commissioner of Income-Tax-8(1), Mumbai
.. Respondent
...................
Mr. Atul K. Jasani for the Appellant.
Mr. N. C. Mohanty for the Respondent.
...................
CORAM : UJJAL BHUYAN &
MILIND N. JADHAV, JJ.
DATE : FEBRUARY 03, 2021.
P.C.:
Heard Mr. Atul Jasani, learned counsel for the appellant andMr. N. C. Mohanty, learned standing counsel, revenue for therespondent.
2. This appeal under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 hasbeen preferred by the assessee as the appellant against the order dated01.06.2018 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, "F" Bench,Mumbai in ITA No. 7409/Mum/2012 for the assessment year 2008-09.
3.The appeal is pending for admission.
4. It is submitted that Parliament has enacted the Direct Tax Vivadse Vishwas Act, 2020 (briefly 'the Act' hereinafter) providing for ascheme for resolution of tax disputes. Appellant has filed a declarationunder section 3 of the said Act before the Designated Authority whichhad thereafter issued a certificate under section 5(1) of the said Actdetermining the amount refundable to the appellant. However, forpassing of the final order under section 5(2) of the said Act, appellantis required to withdraw the appeal in terms of section 4(3) thereof.Hence, the prayer for withdrawal of the appeal.
5. Learned counsel for the respondent has no objection to theprayer made for withdrawal of the appeal.
6. Considering the above, we allow the appellant to withdraw theappeal. Accordingly, the appeal is disposed of as withdrawn.
7. Refund as per Rules.
[ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]
[ UJJAL BHUYAN, J. ]
Digitally signedRavindraby Ravindra M.M.AmberkarDate:Amberkar2021.02.0514:18:16 +0530
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.