Case Law › High Court › F.i. Rebello, J v. M/S. Audco India Ltd

F.i. Rebello, J v. M/S. Audco India Ltd

High Court 12 Feb 2008 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

12 Feb 2008

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In F.i. Rebello, J v. M/S. Audco India Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Mr.B.M.Chatterji with Mrs.P.P.Bhosdale and P.S.Sahadevanfor the Appellant. Mr.A.K.Jasani for the Respondent. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO &R.S. MOHITE, JJ.DATED : 12TH FEBRUARY,2008. PC : 1. Considering the cause shown, delay condoned. Office to register the appeal. (R.S. MOHITE, J.) (F.I. REBELLO, J.) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL LODG. NO.2608 OF 2006The Commissioner of Income Tax-2...Appellant.Vs.M/s. Audco India Ltd...Respondent. Mr.B.M.Chatterji with Mrs.P.P.Bhosdale and P.S.Sahadevanfor the Appellant. Mr.A.K.Jasani for the Respondent. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO &R.S. MOHITE, JJ.DATED : 12TH FEBRUARY,2008. PC : was dismissed by order dated 4.2.2008. For reasons set out therein, the present appeal also dismissed. (R.S. MOHITE, J.) (F.I. REBELLO, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.