Fiberfill Engineers v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
10 Aug 2017 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Fiberfill Engineers v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
10 Aug 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Fiberfill Engineers v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2017) decided the matter.
Decision: This petition is accordingly disposed of as having become infructuous.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
$~5
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 4109/2015
FIBERFILL ENGINEERS ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Gautam Jain, Mr. Piyush Kumar Kamal, Advocates.
Versus
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Rahul Chaudhary, Sr.Standing
Counsel with Mr.Sanjay Kumar, Ms.Lakshmi Gurung, Advocates.
CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH
O R D E R% 10.08.2017
1. It is agreed by both the counsel for the parties that this writ petition has become infructuous in view of the subsequent developments.
2. This petition is accordingly disposed of as having become infructuous.
S.MURALIDHAR, J
AUGUST 10, 2017 ‘anb’
PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue