First Flight Couriers Ltd v. Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax 4(2), Mumbai And Others
High Court
02 May 2013 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
First Flight Couriers Ltd v. Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax 4(2), Mumbai And Others
Date of order
02 May 2013
Assessment year(s)
2011-12, 2007-08
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In First Flight Couriers Ltd v. Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax 4(2), Mumbai And Others, the High Court (2013) decided the matter.
Decision: The Petition is accordingly disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.814 OF 2013
First Flight Couriers Ltd...Petitioner.versusAdditional Commissioner of Income Tax4(2), Mumbaiand others..Respondents.
.....
Mr. Jehangir D. Mistri, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sandeep Dadwal i/b Mr. Prakash Mahadik for the Petitioner.Mr. Suresh Kumar for the Respondents.
.....
CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, ANDA.A. SAYED, JJ. 2 May 2013.
P.C. :
The Petitioner seeks to question the action of the Income Tax Department in deducting an amount of Rs.3,86,41,602/- from the amount refundable for Assessment Year 2011-12. For Assessment Year 2011-12 an intimation was issued on 25 March 2013 under Section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act 1961 quantifying the amount refundable to the Petitioner at Rs.7,55,41,697/-. For Assessment Year 2007-08 an order of assessment was passed on 8 March 2013, following which a notice of demand under Section 156 dated 8 March 2013 came to be issued. The Petitioner has stated that the notice of demand under Section 156 was actually served on 22 March 2013 as result of which the Petitioner had a period of thirty days to pay the amount demanded. The grievance of the Petitioner is that without waiting for the expiry of the period of thirty days available in law under Section 245, the adjustment was carried out from the refund payable to the Petitioner for Assessment Year 2011-12 and the balance was refunded in the amount of Rs.3.69 Crores on 3 April 2013. In response to a representation dated 4 April 2013 the Petitioner was informed on 9 April 2013 by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 4(2) Mumbai that this was done in pursuance of the directions of the Additional Commissioner of Income Tax, Range 4(2).
2.The learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner states that the Petitioner shall within a period of one week from today file an application for stay of the demand for Assessment Year 2007-08. Counsel appearing on behalf of the Revenue states that upon such an application being filed, the Assessing Officer shall dispose of the application for stay within a period of one week from the receipt thereof and the balance, if any, that is refundable shall be refunded together with interest expeditiously within two weeks thereafter. The Petition is accordingly disposed of.
There shall be no order as to costs.
(Dr. D.Y.Chandrachud, J.)
(A.A. Sayed, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.