Case LawHigh Court › Flair Buildtech Private Limited v. Incom...

Flair Buildtech Private Limited v. Income Tax Officer

High Court 18 May 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Flair Buildtech Private Limited v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
18 May 2018
Assessment year(s)
2011-12
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Flair Buildtech Private Limited v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.

Decision: The writ petition is disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

$~19. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5337/2018 FLAIR BUILDTECH PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Saubhagya Agarwal & Mr. Aditya Agarwal, Advocates. versus INCOME TAX OFFICER ..... Respondent Through Mr. Ajit Sharma & Mr. Asheesh Jain, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR % O R D E R18.05.2018 It will be appropriate and proper for the writ petitioner to follow the procedure laid down and prescribed by GKN Driveshaft (India) Limited versus Income Tax Officer and Others, (2003) 259 ITR 19 (SC). The petitioners should file objections, and also raise the contention that the company Flair Buildtech Private Limited has been dissolved and hence notice under Section 147/148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the Assessment Year 2011-12 is a nullity and invalid in law. We have made the aforesaid observations, as there are other cases of this nature and in some cases detailed orders have been passed by the Assessing Officers. Applications for revival of the company have been filed before the National Company Law Tribunal, and some cases, interim orders have been passed. Accordingly, we are not inclined to entertain the present writ petition at this stage and leave it to the petitioner to follow the procedure prescribed in GKN Driveshaft (India) Limited (supra). We clarify that we have not made any observations on merits. In case of an adverse order, it will be open to the petitioner to challenge the same in accordance with law. The writ petition is disposed of. SANJIV KHANNA, J. MAY 18, 2018 VKR CHANDER SHEKHAR, J.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan