Case Law › High Court › Following The Judgment Of The Supreme Co...

Following The Judgment Of The Supreme Court In Cit v. Corporation Bank, 295 I.t.r. 193, We Dismiss The Department Appeal

High Court 10 Sep 2009 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · highcourtofkerala

Parties

Date of order

10 Sep 2009

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Following The Judgment Of The Supreme Court In Cit v. Corporation Bank, 295 I.t.r. 193, We Dismiss The Department Appeal, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: 193, we dismiss the departmentappeal.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.MOHANAN THURSDAY, THE 10TH SEPTEMBER 2009 / 19TH BHADRA 1931 ITA.No. 1409 of 2009() ---------------------- TA.6/COCH/1999 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH .................... APPELLANT/APPELLANT --------------------------------------- THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TRICHUR. BY ADV. SRI.P.K.R.MENON,SR.COUNSEL, GOI(TAXES) SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENT ------------------------- TE CATHOLIC SYRIAN BANK LTD,TRICHUR. THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/09/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C .N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR &V.K. MOHANAN, JJ. -------------------------------------------- I.T.A. No. 1409 OF 2009 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 10th day of September, 2009 JUDGMENT Ramachandran Nair, J. Following the judgment of the Supreme Court in CIT V.CORPORATION BANK, 295 I.T.R. 193, we dismiss the departmentappeal. (C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR)Judge. (V.K. MOHANAN) Judge. kk

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.