For Approval And Signature v. Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
11 Feb 2004 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
For Approval And Signature v. Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
11 Feb 2004
Assessment year(s)
1982-83
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In For Approval And Signature v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2004) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- C S HOTELS PVT LTD Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 231 of 1991
For Approval and Signature:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH
and
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.KAPADIA
============================================================
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- C S HOTELS PVT LTD
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
--------------------------------------------------------------
Appearance:
1. INCOME TAX REFERENCE No. 231 of 1991
NOTICE SERVED for Petitioner No. 1 MR MANISH R BHATT for Respondent No. 1
--------------------------------------------------------------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH
and
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.KAPADIA
Date of decision: 11/02/2004
(Per : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH)
�In this reference under Section 256 (1) of the
Income-tax Act, 1961 at the instance of the petitioner assessee, the following question was referred for our opinion in respect of the assessment year 1982-83:-
"Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of
the case, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal was
right in law in holding that the amounts in the
accounts of the directors are "deposits" within
the meaning of section 40A(8) of the Income Tax Act and, therefore, was liable to disallowance at 15% of interest on such accounts?"
�When the reference is called out for hearing, none appears for the petitioner assessee though served. Mr. Manish R. Bhatt, learned standing counsel appears
for the revenue.
�Though the reference was made at the instance of the assessee in the year 1991, neither paper book is filed nor any one appears for the assessee. Hence we
the assessee in the year 1991, neither paper book is filed nor any one appears for the assessee. Hence we decline to answer the question referred for our opinion.
�The reference accordingly stands disposed of for
want of prosecution.
����(M.S. Shah, J.)
����(A.M. Kapadia, J.)
���---
(karan)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.