For Approval And Signature v. Nirman Investments Pvt Ltd
High Court
01 Oct 2002 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
For Approval And Signature v. Nirman Investments Pvt Ltd
Date of order
01 Oct 2002
Assessment year(s)
1983-84
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In For Approval And Signature v. Nirman Investments Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2002) allowed the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 116 of 1991
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE
and
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA
============================================================
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
Versus
NIRMAN INVESTMENTS PVT LTD
--------------------------------------------------------------
Appearance:
1. INCOME TAX REFERENCE No. 116 of 1991
MR TANVISH BHATT for Petitioner No. 1
MR MK PATEL for Respondent No. 1
--------------------------------------------------------------
CORAM : MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE
and
MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA
Date of decision: 01/10/2002
(Per : MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE)
�At the instance of the revenue, the following
question of law has been referred to this Court under the
provisions of Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961
for opinion of this Court.
"Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances
of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was right in
law in holding that interest on redeemable bonds
and convertible debentures attributable to the
period under consideration was not includible in
the total income of the assessee for A.Y.
1983-84?"
�Learned advocate Shri M.R. Bhatt has appeared
for the revenue whereas learned advocate Shri R.K. Patel
has appeared for the respondent-assessee.
�It has been submitted by the learned advocates
appearing for the parties that the question, which has been referred to this Court, has already been answered by this Court in I.T.R. No. 110/1990 on 10th July, 2002.
Looking to the law laid down by this Court in the Income Tax Reference No. 110/1990, we answer the question referred to this Court in the affirmative i.e. in favour
of the assessee and against the revenue.
�The Reference stands disposed of accordingly with
no order as to costs.
�����(A.R. DAVE,J.)
�����(D.A. MEHTA,J.)
siji
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.