Case LawHigh Court › For Approval And Signature v. Shilpi Adv...

For Approval And Signature v. Shilpi Advertising Limited

High Court 01 Oct 2002 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
For Approval And Signature v. Shilpi Advertising Limited
Date of order
01 Oct 2002
Assessment year(s)
1983-84
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In For Approval And Signature v. Shilpi Advertising Limited, the High Court (2002) allowed the appeal.

Issue: Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 117 of 1991 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE and Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX. Versus SHILPI ADVERTISING LIMITED -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. INCOME TAX REFERENCE No. 117 of 1991 MR TANVISH BHATT for Petitioner No. 1 NOTICE UNSERVED for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE and MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA Date of decision: 01/10/2002 (Per : MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE) �At the instance of the revenue, the following question of law has been referred to this Court under the provisions of Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for opinion of this Court. "Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was right in law in holding that interest on the convertible debentures in question attributable to the period ending on 31st March, 1983 was not includible in the total income of the assessee for A.Y. 1983-84" �Learned advocate Shri M.R. Bhatt has appeared for the revenue whereas learned advocate Shri R.K. Patel has appeared for the respondent-assessee. �It has been submitted by the learned advocates appearing for the parties that the question, which has been referred to this Court, has already been answered by this Court in I.T.R. No. 110/1990 on 10th July, 2002. Looking to the law laid down by this Court, in the Income Tax Reference No. 110/1990, we answer the question referred to this Court in the affirmative i.e. in favour of the assessee and against the revenue. �The Reference stands disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs. �����(A.R. DAVE,J.) �����(D.A. MEHTA,J.) siji
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan