In For Income Tax Department v. Saradadevi Lath ….Opposite Party, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Order No.
02.
M. Panda
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CMAPL No.157 of 2017
…. Petitioner
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Sambalpur
Mr. S. S. Mohapatra, Sr. Standing Counsel
for Income Tax Department
-versus-
Saradadevi Lath ….Opposite Party
CORAM:
THE CHIEF JUSTICE
JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY
ORDER
16.05.2023
1. The appearance memo filed by Mr. S. S. Mohapatra, learned Senior Standing Counsel for Income Tax Department in Court today is taken on record.
2. Learned Senior Standing Counsel for the Petitioner does not wish
to press this CMAPL.
3. The CMAPL is dismissed as not pressed.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar)
Chief Justice
(G. Satapathy)
Judge
Signature Not Verified
Digitally SignedSigned by: MRUTYUNJAYA PANDADesignation: Personal AssistantReason: AuthenticationLocation: Orissa High Court, CuttackDate: 17-May-2023 10:21:37
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.