For Orders See Cwp v. The Assistant Commissioner Ofincome Tax, Panchkula”
High Court
08 Jan 2016 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
For Orders See Cwp v. The Assistant Commissioner Ofincome Tax, Panchkula”
Date of order
08 Jan 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In For Orders See Cwp v. The Assistant Commissioner Ofincome Tax, Panchkula”, the High Court (2016) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
208/B
CWP No. 27603 of 2015 (O&M)Decided on: 08.01.2016
M/s Haryana Urban Development Authority
..Petitioner
6",*4*
The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax,Panchkula
Respondent
CORAM:Hon bie Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar MittalHon'ble Mrs. Justice Raj Rahul GargPresent:Ms. Radhika Suri, Senior Advocate withMs. Rajni Paul, Advocate for the petitioner.Mr. Yogesh Putney, Advocatefor the respondent-revenue. >>>>
Ajay Kumar Mittal, J. (Oral)
For orders see CWP No. 2/60/ of 2015 titled as'M/s HaryanaUrban Development Authority vs. The Assistant Commissioner ofIncome Tax, Panchkula”.
(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL)JUDGE
(RAJ RAHUL GARG )|08.01.2016JUDGEWa SCC
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue