In For Orders See Cwp v. The Assistant Commissioner Ofincome Tax, Panchkula”, the High Court (2016) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
208/C
CWP No. 27604 of 2015 (O&M)Decided on: 08.01.2016
M/s Haryana Urban Development Authority
..Petitioner
6",*4*
The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax,Panchkula
Ajay Kumar Mittal, J. (Oral)
For orders see CWP No. 2/60/ of 2015 titled as'M/s HaryanaUrban Development Authority vs. The Assistant Commissioner ofIncome Tax, Panchkula”.
(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL)JUDGE
(RAJ RAHUL GARG )|08.01.2016JUDGEWa SCC
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.