Case Law › High Court › For Orders, See Ita v. Commissioner Of I...

For Orders, See Ita v. Commissioner Of Income Lax-Ii, Amritsar

High Court 06 Aug 2014 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · phhc

Parties

Date of order

06 Aug 2014

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In For Orders, See Ita v. Commissioner Of Income Lax-Ii, Amritsar, the High Court (2014) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH ITA No.19 of 2012 (O&M)Date of decision: (06.08.201 M/s Pathankot Improvement Trust Vs, .....- Appe Deputy Commissioner of Income lax, Circle, Pathankot and another ....AmeSsponde CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTALHON’ BLE MR. JUSTICE FATEH DEEP SINGH Present: Mr. Devinder Pal Soni, Advocate forMr. Rohit Sud, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Denesh Goyal, Advocate for the revenue. Ajay Kumar Mittal,J, For orders, see ITA No.100 of 2014 (M/s AmritsarImprovement [rust vs. Commissioner of Income lax-II, Amritsar). (Ajay Kumar Mittal)vudge August 06, 2014 (Fateh Deep Singh)Judge ?>$8

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.