Case Law › High Court › For Orders, See Ita v. Commissioner Ofin...

For Orders, See Ita v. Commissioner Ofincome Flax, Aayakar Bhawan, Sector 135, Karnal)_

High Court 04 Feb 2014 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · phhc

Parties

Date of order

04 Feb 2014

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In For Orders, See Ita v. Commissioner Ofincome Flax, Aayakar Bhawan, Sector 135, Karnal)_, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH ITA No.115 of 2013 (O&M)Date of decision: February 04, 2014 M/s Liberty Footwear Co. Vs, .....- Appel Commissioner of Income Jax, Aayakar Bhawan, Sector 13, Karnal ....mesponden CORAM: HON’?BLE MR. JUSTICEK AJAY KUMAR MITTHON BLE MS. JUSTICE ANITA CHAUDHRY Present:Mr. S.K.Mukhi, Advocate for the appellant. | Mr. Yogesh Putney, Advocate for the respondent. Ajay Kumar Mittal,J, For orders, see ITA No.112 of 2013 (M/s Liberty Footwear Co.v. Commissioner ofIncome flax, Aayakar Bhawan, Sector 135, Karnal) (Ajay Kumar Mittal)Judge February 04, 2014>=%> (Anita Chaudhry)Judge

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.