For Orders, See Ita v. Commissioner Ofincome Tax, Panchkula (Haryana
High Court
17 Sep 2015 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
For Orders, See Ita v. Commissioner Ofincome Tax, Panchkula (Haryana
Date of order
17 Sep 2015
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In For Orders, See Ita v. Commissioner Ofincome Tax, Panchkula (Haryana, the High Court (2015) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH
ITA No. 38 of 2015 (O&M)Date of decision: 17.9.2015
Prashant Dutt Chaudhary
.....- Appe
Commissioner of Income Tax, Panchkula (Haryana)
...eSpondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICK AJAY KUMAR MITTALHON’ BLE MR. JUSTICEK RAMENDRA JAIN
Present: Ms. Divya Suri, Advocate with Ms. Madhur Sharma, Advocate,Mr. Deepanshu Jain and Mr. Sachin Bhardwaj, Advocate for theappellant-assessee.
Mr. Yogesh Putney, Advocate for the respondent-revenue.
Ajay Kumar Mittal,J.
CM No.13835 Cll of 2015
Allowed as prayed for. The additional and modified substantialquestions of law are taken on record. CM stands disposed of.
CM No.3835 CII of 2015
There is a delay of 1214 days in filing the appeal. For the reasonsstated in the application and after hearing learned counsel for the parties, the delayin filing the appeal is condoned. CM stands disposed of.
ITA No.38 of 2015
For orders, see ITA No.25 of 2015[Vikrant Dutt Chaudhary vs.
Commissioner ofIncome Tax, Panchkula (Haryana)].
(Ajay Kumar Mittal)Judge
September 17, 2015
=;&=
GURBAX SINGH
(Ramendra Jain)
Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.