Case LawHigh Court › For Orders, See Ita v. Commissioner Ofin...

For Orders, See Ita v. Commissioner Ofincome Tax, Panchkula (Haryana

High Court 17 Sep 2015 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
For Orders, See Ita v. Commissioner Ofincome Tax, Panchkula (Haryana
Date of order
17 Sep 2015
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In For Orders, See Ita v. Commissioner Ofincome Tax, Panchkula (Haryana, the High Court (2015) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH ITA No. 38 of 2015 (O&M)Date of decision: 17.9.2015 Prashant Dutt Chaudhary .....- Appe Commissioner of Income Tax, Panchkula (Haryana) ...eSpondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICK AJAY KUMAR MITTALHON’ BLE MR. JUSTICEK RAMENDRA JAIN Present: Ms. Divya Suri, Advocate with Ms. Madhur Sharma, Advocate,Mr. Deepanshu Jain and Mr. Sachin Bhardwaj, Advocate for theappellant-assessee. Mr. Yogesh Putney, Advocate for the respondent-revenue. Ajay Kumar Mittal,J. CM No.13835 Cll of 2015 Allowed as prayed for. The additional and modified substantialquestions of law are taken on record. CM stands disposed of. CM No.3835 CII of 2015 There is a delay of 1214 days in filing the appeal. For the reasonsstated in the application and after hearing learned counsel for the parties, the delayin filing the appeal is condoned. CM stands disposed of. ITA No.38 of 2015 For orders, see ITA No.25 of 2015[Vikrant Dutt Chaudhary vs. Commissioner ofIncome Tax, Panchkula (Haryana)]. (Ajay Kumar Mittal)Judge September 17, 2015 =;&= GURBAX SINGH (Ramendra Jain) Judge
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan