Case Law › High Court › For Orders, See Ita v. Commissioner Of I...

For Orders, See Ita v. Commissioner Of Incometax, Ludhiana (Punjab

High Court 21 May 2014 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · phhc

Parties

Date of order

21 May 2014

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In For Orders, See Ita v. Commissioner Of Incometax, Ludhiana (Punjab, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH ITA No.177 of 2012 (O&M)Date of decision:21.5.2014 B.K.Jain, 94-D, Bhai Randhir Singh Nagar, Ludhiana (Punjab) .....- Appe Vs, Commissioner of Income Tax, Ludhiana (Punjab) ...mespondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICEK AJAY KUMAR MITTAHON’ BLE MR. JUSTICE JASPAL SINGH Present:Mr. Sachin Bhardwaj, Advocate for the appellant. Ajay Kumar Mittal,J, For orders, see ITA No.363 of 2011 (B.K.Jain, 94-D, BhalRandhir Singh Nagar, Ludhiana (Punjab) vs. Commissioner of IncomeTax, Ludhiana (Punjab). (Ajay Kumar Mittal)Judge May 21, 2014>0$> (Jaspal Singh)Judge

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.