Case Law › High Court › For Orders, See Ita v. M/S Groz Beckert...

For Orders, See Ita v. M/S Groz Beckert Asia Limited

High Court 17 Feb 2016 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · phhc

Parties

Date of order

17 Feb 2016

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In For Orders, See Ita v. M/S Groz Beckert Asia Limited, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH ITA No.702 of 2008 (O&M)Date of decision: 17.2.2016 The Commissioner of Income Tax, Patiala. .....- Appe VS, M/s Groz Beckert Asia Limited ....mesponden CORAM: HON BLE MR. JUSTICK AJAY KUMAR MITTALHON BLE MRS. JUSTICEK RAJ RAHUL GARG Present: Mr. Zora Singh Klar, Advocate for the appellant-revenue.Mr. C.S.Aggarwal, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Rinku Dahiya,Advocate for the respondent-assessee. | Ajay Kumar Mittal, J For orders, see ITA No.687 of 2008(The Commissioner ofIncome Tax, Patiala vs. M/s Groz Beckert Asia Limited). (Ajay Kumar Mittal)sudge February 17, 2016><$> (Ray Rahul Garg)sudge

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.