Formerly Known As Hindustan Lever Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Special Range-2 And Anr
High Court
03 Feb 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Formerly Known As Hindustan Lever Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Special Range-2 And Anr
Date of order
03 Feb 2021
Assessment year(s)
1987-88
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Formerly Known As Hindustan Lever Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Special Range-2 And Anr, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.
Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is disposed of as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 612 OF 2010
Hindustan Unilever Ltd.
(formerly known as Hindustan Lever Ltd.)..Appellant
Versus
Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Special Range-2 and Anr.
..Respondents
...................
Mr. Rajesh Poojary i/by Mulla & Mulla Craigie Blunt and Caroe for theAppellant.Appellant.
Mr. Suresh Kumar for the Respondents.
...................
CORAM : UJJAL BHUYAN &
MILIND N. JADHAV, JJ.
DATE : FEBRUARY 03, 2021.
P.C.:
Heard Mr. Rajesh Poojary, learned counsel for the appellant andMr. Suresh Kumar, learned standing counsel, revenue for therespondents.
2. This appeal under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 hasbeen preferred by the assessee as the appellant against the order dated08.07.2009 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai
Bench "J", Mumbai in ITA No. 1679/Mum/91 and in ITA No.1817/Mum/91 for the assessment year 1987-88.
3.The appeal was admitted by this Court on 18.01.2011 on thesubstantial questions of law framed in the said order.
4.Today the appeal is before us on a praecipe filed by learnedcounsel for the appellant.
5. It is submitted that Parliament has enacted the Direct Tax Vivadse Vishwas Act, 2020 (briefly 'the Act' hereinafter) providing for ascheme for resolution of tax disputes. Appellant has filed a declarationunder section 3 of the said Act before the Designated Authority whichhad thereafter issued a certificate under section 5(1) of the said Actdetermining the amount payable by the appellant at Nil. However, forpassing of the final order under section 5(2) of the said Act, appellantis required to withdraw the appeal in terms of section 4(3) thereof.Hence, the prayer for withdrawal of the appeal.
6. Learned counsel for the respondent has no objection to theprayer made for withdrawal of the appeal.
7. Considering the above, we allow the appellant to withdraw theappeal. Accordingly, the appeal is disposed of as withdrawn.
8. Refund as per Rules.
[ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]
[ UJJAL BHUYAN, J. ]
Digitallysigned byRavindraRavindra M.AmberkarM.Date:Amberkar2021.02.0514:37:33+0530signed byRavindraRavindra M.AmberkarM.Date:Amberkar2021.02.0514:37:33+0530
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.