Case LawHigh Court › Fugro Subsea Services Ltd v. Asst. Direc...

Fugro Subsea Services Ltd v. Asst. Director Of Income-Tax (Internationaltaxation)-3(2

High Court 20 Jan 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Fugro Subsea Services Ltd v. Asst. Director Of Income-Tax (Internationaltaxation)-3(2
Date of order
20 Jan 2021
Assessment year(s)
2010-11
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Fugro Subsea Services Ltd v. Asst. Director Of Income-Tax (Internationaltaxation)-3(2, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.

Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is disposed of as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYO.O.C.J. INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1297 OF 2016 Fugro Subsea Services Ltd..Appellant Versus Asst. Director of Income-tax (InternationalTaxation)-3(2)..Respondent ................... Ms. Jasmine Amalsadvala i/by Mint & Confreres for the Appellant Ms. Jasmine Amalsadvala i/by Mint & Confreres for the Appellant Mr. Akhileshkumar Sharma for the Respondent Mr. Akhileshkumar Sharma for the Respondent ................... CORAM : UJJAL BHUYAN & MILIND N. JADHAV, JJ. DATE : JANUARY 20, 2021. P.C.: Heard Ms. Amalsadvala, learned counsel for theappellant and Mr. Sharma, learned standing counsel revenuefor the respondent. 2. This appeal under section 260A of the Income Tax Act,1961 has been preferred by the assessee as the appellantagainst the order dated 08.01.2016 passed by the IncomeTax Appellate Tribunal, 'F' Bench, Mumbai in I.T.A. No. 1230/Mum/2014 for the assessment year 2010-11. 3.The appeal was admitted by this Court on 31.01.2019on the substantial questions of law framed in the said order. 4.Today the appeal is before us on a praecipe filed bylearned counsel for the appellant. 5.It is submitted that Parliament has enacted the DirectTax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020 (briefly 'the Act' hereinafter)providing for a scheme for resolution of tax disputes.Appellant has filed a declaration under section 3 of the saidAct before the Designated Authority which had thereafterissued a certificate under section 5(1) of the said Act on05.01.2021 determining the amount refundable to theappellant. However, for passing of the final order undersection 5(2) of the said Act, appellant is required to withdrawthe appeal in terms of section 4(3) thereof. Hence, theprayer for withdrawal of the appeal. 6.Learned counsel for the respondent has no objection tothe prayer made for withdrawal of the appeal. 7.Considering the above, we allow the appellant towithdraw the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is disposed of as withdrawn. 8.Refund as per Rules. [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] [ UJJAL BHUYAN, J. ] Digitallysigned byRavindraRavindra M.AmberkarM.Date:Amberkar2021.01.2111:50:03+0530
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan