Fulchand J. Talathi v. The Income Tax Officer, Nagpur
High Court
27 Aug 2010 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · testcase
Parties
Fulchand J. Talathi v. The Income Tax Officer, Nagpur
Date of order
27 Aug 2010
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Fulchand J. Talathi v. The Income Tax Officer, Nagpur, the High Court (2010) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 80 OF 2010
ININCOME TAX APPEAL No. 25 OF 2002
( Fulchand J. Talathi ..vs.. The Income Tax Officer, Nagpur )
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Office Notes, Office Memoranda ofCoram, appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's order
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shri Bhattad, Advocate for the appellant,Shri A.S. Jaiswal, Advocate for the respondent.
CORAM:- J.P. DEVADHAR AND
A.B. CHAUDHARI, JJ.DATED :- 27th AUGUST, 2010
Heard.
For the reasons stated in the application, civil application is allowed.
Civil application is disposed of.
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 81 OF 2010
Heard.
For the reasons stated in the application, civil application is allowed.
Civil application is disposed of.
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 78 OF 2010
Heard.
For the reasons stated in the application, civil application is allowed.
Civil application is disposed of.
JUDGE
JUDGE
pma
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.