Full Bench Decision Reported In The Mavilayi Service Co v. Operative Bank Ltd, The Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
25 Feb 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Full Bench Decision Reported In The Mavilayi Service Co v. Operative Bank Ltd, The Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
25 Feb 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Full Bench Decision Reported In The Mavilayi Service Co v. Operative Bank Ltd, The Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI
TUESDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2020 / 6TH PHALGUNA, 1941
WP(C).No.5287 OF 2020(I)
PETITIONER/S:
THE NELLIMOODU SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.2639,REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, NELLIMOODU P.O. THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT 695 524.
BY ADVS.SRI.T.R.HARIKUMARSRI.ARJUN RAGHAVAN
RESPONDENT/S:
1THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,INCOME TAX, AAYAKR BHAVAN, KAWDIAR P.O. THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 003.INCOME TAX, AAYAKR BHAVAN, KAWDIAR P.O. THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 003.
WARD 2 (2), OFFICE OF THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF
2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(APPEALS), AAYAKAR BHAVAN, KOWDIAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 003.(APPEALS), AAYAKAR BHAVAN, KOWDIAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 003.
BY SRI.JOS WINSON FOR CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON25.02.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No.5287 OF 2020 2
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 25th day of February 2020
Heard Sri. T.R.Harikumar, the learned counsel for
the petitioner and Sri. Jose Winson holding for Sri.Christopher Abraham, the learned Standing Counsel forrespondents.
2.Petitioner refers to and relies on judgment
dated 01.07.2019 in W.A No.1536 of 2019 and connected
cases to contend that the Division Bench directeddisposal of appeal and granted stay of recoveryproceedings during the pendency of the appeal.
3.
The learned Standing Counsel admits that the
facts of the case are substantially same and similar to thefacts noted by the Division Bench in W.A. No.1536 of2019, hence can be followed.
Hence, the writ petition is disposed of directing theCommissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/ 2[nd] respondent
to consider and dispose of the statutory appeal filed bythe petitioner herein at the earliest taking note of the
Full Bench decision reported in The Mavilayi Service Co-
v. operative Bank Ltd, The Commissioner of Income Tax,
Calicut[2019 (2) KHC 287] and to keep in abeyancerecovery proceedings and collection of tax assessed,pending disposal of such appeal.
Sd/-
S.V.BHATTI
JUDGE
uu
27.02.2020
WP(C).No.5287 OF 2020 4
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1A TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDERFOR THE YEAR 2017-2018 DATED 24.12.2019.
EXHIBIT P2A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED UNDER SECTION 156 OF THE INCOME TAXACT DATED 24.12.2019.UNDER SECTION 156 OF THE INCOME TAXACT DATED 24.12.2019.
EXHIBIT P3A TRUE COPY OF THE ONLINE APPEAL DATED 04.01.2020 ALONG WITH GROUNDSOF APPEAL FILED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT AGAINST EXT P1 ASSESSMENT ORDER.DATED 04.01.2020 ALONG WITH GROUNDSOF APPEAL FILED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT AGAINST EXT P1 ASSESSMENT ORDER.
EXHIBIT P4A TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER IN EXT P3 APPEAL DATED 17.01.2020.FILED BY THE PETITIONER IN EXT P3 APPEAL DATED 17.01.2020.
EXHIBIT P5A TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION NO. ITBA/COM/F/17/2019-20/1024749007(1) DATED 05.02.2020,
ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P6A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 19.07.2019 IN W.A. NO. 1639 OF 2019.19.07.2019 IN W.A. NO. 1639 OF 2019.
EXHIBIT P7A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 25.11.2019 IN WPC NO. 31787 OF 2019.25.11.2019 IN WPC NO. 31787 OF 2019.
EXHIBIT P8
A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 17.02.2020 IN WPC NO. 4310 OF 2020.17.02.2020 IN WPC NO. 4310 OF 2020.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.