In Gabriel India Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax 5(1, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
R.M. AMBERKAR (Private Secretary)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYO.O.C.J.
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 688 OF 2017
Gabriel India Ltd..Appellant
Versus
Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax 5(1)
..Respondent
...................
•Mr. Sanjiv Shah for the Appellant
...................
CORAM : AKIL KURESHI &
SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ.
DATE : MAY 3, 2019.
P.C.:
1.Learned counsel for the appellant – assessee stated
that in view of the order passed by the Income Tax AppellateTribunal in application for rectification, this appeal hasbecome infructuous. The same is disposed of as withdrawn.
2.Refund of Court fees as per rules.
[ SARANG V. KOTWAL, J. ] [ AKIL KURESHI, J ]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue