G.adinarayanan v. The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
30 Oct 2017 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · mdubench
Parties
G.adinarayanan v. The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
30 Oct 2017
Assessment year(s)
2000-01
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In G.adinarayanan v. The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 30.10.2017
C O R A M
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.D.AUDIKESAVALU
W.P.(MD)Nos.6275 and 6276 of 2011and
M.P.(MD)Nos.2 and 2 of 2011
G.Adinarayanan
... Petitioner in both petitions
Vs.
The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax,No.2, V.P. Rathinasamy Nadar Road,Bivikulam, Madurai-625 002....Respondent in both petitions
Common Prayer:Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of theconstitution of India, to issue a writ of certiorarified Mandamus,calling for the records and quash the proceedings of the firstrespondent in the impugned order dated 30.06.2010 bearingC.No.2118/1/CC/MDU/Tech/2003-04, issued by the respondent anddirect the respondents to refund the interest amount so far paidfor the AY 2000-01 and 2001-02.
For Petitioner: Mr.V.S.Jeyakumar
COMMON ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioner has made an endorsementthat he is withdrawing these Writ Petitions.
2.Recording the said endorsement, these Writ Petitions aredismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, the connectedmiscellaneous petitions are closed
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(AE)
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
Sub Assistant Registrar
2
To
The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax,No.2, V.P. Rathinasamy Nadar Road,Bivikulam, Madurai-625 002.
+2cc to M/s.S.Srimathy, Advocate Sr.No.84075,84076TA
VB/SV/MMS/SAR4/14/11/2017/2P/4C
W.P.(MD)Nos.6275 and 6276 of 201130.10.2017
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.