In Gandevi Taluka Khedut Sahakarisangh Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2001) decided the matter.
Issue: Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- GANDEVI TALUKA KHEDUT SAHAKARISANGH LTD.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 69 of 1986
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE
and
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA
============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- GANDEVI TALUKA KHEDUT SAHAKARISANGH LTD.
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:
MR RK PATEL for Petitioner MR AKIL QURESHI for MR MANISH R BHATT for Respondent No. 1
--------------------------------------------------------------
CORAM : MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE
and
MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA
Date of decision: 11/06/2001
(Per : MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE)
�Learned advocate Shri R.K. Patel appearing for the applicant-asessee has submitted that the applicant is not inclined to press for this reference. In the circusmtances, the question which has been referred to
this court is not answered. The reference is returned unanswered.
�����(A.R. Dave, J.)
�����(D.A. Mehta, J.)
(hn)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.