Gandhi Nagar, Adyar, Chennai-600 020 v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemption
High Court
27 Jan 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Gandhi Nagar, Adyar, Chennai-600 020 v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemption
Date of order
27 Jan 2025
Assessment year(s)
2026-27
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Gandhi Nagar, Adyar, Chennai-600 020 v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemption, the High Court (2025) decided the matter.
Decision: With the above directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 27.01.2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ
W.P. No.1969 of 2025andW.M.P.Nos.2301 to 2304 of 2025
Karadi Cultural Alliance Trust Rep by its Managing Trustee,Shobha Viswanath
3A, Dev Regency, 11 First Main Road,
Gandhi Nagar, Adyar, Chennai-600 020.
Vs.
... Petitioner
Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption),
Income Tax Department,
No.121, M.G.Road, Nungambakkam,
Chennai 600 034.
... Respondent
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the Respondent contained in its order in Form No. l0AD, bearing DIN and Notice No.ITBA/EXM/F/EXM45/2024-25/1070772096(1), dated 29.11.2024, for PAN: , and to quash the same as arbitrary, unjust and illegal and
W.P.No.1969 of 2025
to consequently, direct the Respondent to grant the Petitioner registration under clause (iii) to the First Proviso to subsection (5) of Section 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Years 2022-23 to AY 2026-27.
For Petitioner : Mr.Suhrith Parthasarathy
For Respondent: Mr.V.Mahalingam
Senior Standing Counsel
Assisted by Mrs.S.Premalatha
Standing Counsel
ORDER
The present Writ Petition is filed challenging the impugned order dated 29.11.2024, on the limited ground that the petitioner's request for time vide letter
dated 21.11.2024 to produce material/data until 30.11.2024 was not even dealt with while passing the impugned order.
2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner had filed an application on 28.05.2024, seeking registration under clause (iii) of the First Proviso to sub-section (5) of Section 80G of the Income
Tax Act. During the course of processing the petitioner's application, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption)/respondent had sought for details vide letter/notices dated 19.08.2024 and 25.09.2024, with regard to the
genuineness of the activities of the petitioner trust/institution including copy of
the trust deed, Audited balance sheet and income tax returns for the last three https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis2/5
W.P.No.1969 of 2025
years. The petitioner had responded to the above notices vide reply dated 21.11.2024 and 25.11.2024, the petitioner were required to furnish further
certain documents. Pursuant thereto, the petitioner sought for time till November 2024 to furnish the detailed impact reports, MoU clauses mapped to activities, beneficiary counts, donor feedback and details, and photographic and video evidence showcasing activities. However, without dealing with the above request for time, the impugned order came to be passed by the respondent.
3. On this being pointed, the learned Senior Standing Counsel for the respondent would submit that the petitioner may submit their reply along with relevant documentary evidence, within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and the same would be considered and orders passed within the time stipulated by this Court.
4. In view thereof, the impugned order dated 29.11.2024 is set aside with the following directions:
(i) The petitioner shall submit their reply along with relevant documents/materials, if any, within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
(ii) Upon receipt of such reply/other materials filed by the petitioner, the
respondent shall consider the same and pass appropriate orders, within a period
of two months thereafter, on merits and in accordance with law, after affording
the petitioner a reasonable opportunity of hearing.
(iii) It is left open to the petitioner to raise all the contentions before the respondent.
5. With the above directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.
Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.
27.01.2025
(i) The petitioner shall submit their reply along with relevant documents/materials, if any, within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
(ii) Upon receipt of such reply/other materials filed by the petitioner, the
respondent shall consider the same and pass appropriate orders, within a period
of two months thereafter, on merits and in accordance with law, after affording
the petitioner a reasonable opportunity of hearing.
(iii) It is left open to the petitioner to raise all the contentions before the respondent.
5. With the above directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.
Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.
27.01.2025
Speaking (or) Non Speaking OrderIndex : Yes/ NoNeutral Citation: Yes/Nojd
ToCommissioner of Income Tax (Exemption),Income Tax Department,No.121, M.G.Road, Nungambakkam,
Chennai 600 034.
W.P.No.1969 of 2025
MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J.
jd
W.P. No.1969 of 2025
27.01.2025
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.