Case Law › High Court › Gangadhar Narsingas Agarwal ( Huf ) Rep....

Gangadhar Narsingas Agarwal ( Huf ) Rep. By Attorney Shridhar Hegde v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 10 Oct 2023 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · hcbgoa

Parties

Date of order

10 Oct 2023

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Gangadhar Narsingas Agarwal ( Huf ) Rep. By Attorney Shridhar Hegde v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2023) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Niti IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOAMISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO.378 OF 2023 INTAX APPEAL NO.52 OF 2014 GANGADHAR NARSINGAS AGARWAL ( HUF ) REP. BY ATTORNEY SHRIDHAR HEGDE VersusTHE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ... APPLICANT ... RESPONDENT Mr Ashok Kulkarni with Ms Pooja Naik, Advocate for the Applicant. Ms Amira Razaq, Standing Counsel for the Respondent. CORAM:- M. S. SONAK & BHARAT P. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATED :- 10th October, 2023 P.C.: Heard Mr Kulkarni who appears with Ms Pooja Naik for theapplicant and Ms Amira Razaq for the respondent. 2. Mr Kulkarni seeks leave to withdraw this application with liberty to make his submissions before the ITAT, where the matters arepending. Accordingly, this application is disposed of with liberty asprayed for. BHARAT P. DESHPANDE, J. Digitally signed by NITI K NITI K HALDANKAR HALDANKARDate: 2023.10.10 16:30:37 +05'30' M. S. SONAK, J.

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.