Gangadhar Narsingas Agrawal ( Huf v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
11 Jul 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcbgoa
Parties
Gangadhar Narsingas Agrawal ( Huf v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
11 Jul 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Gangadhar Narsingas Agrawal ( Huf v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2014) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 503 OF 2014IN
STAMP NUMBER MAIN NO. 414 OF 2014
GANGADHAR NARSINGAS AGRAWAL ( HUF
) VersusTHE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX.
... Applicant
... Respondent
Mr.Sudin Usgaonkar, Advocate for the applicant.Ms. Asha Desai, Advocate for the respondent.
-Coram:MOHIT S. SHAH, C.J. &RANJIT MORE, J.-Date:11th July, 2014
P.C.
Having heard learned counsel for the parties, we find thatsufficient cause is shown for delay of 38 days in filing the TaxAppeal. The delay is condoned. Application is allowed in terms ofprayer clauses(a) and (b).
2. Application accordingly stands disposed of.
vn
RANJIT MORE, J.
MOHIT S. SHAH, C.J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue