Ganpati Infotech, 37-K Block, Sriganganagar v. Union Of India
High Court
17 Aug 2022 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · rhcjodh240618
Parties
Ganpati Infotech, 37-K Block, Sriganganagar v. Union Of India
Date of order
17 Aug 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ganpati Infotech, 37-K Block, Sriganganagar v. Union Of India, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN ATJODHPUR
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4937/2022
Ganpati Infotech, 37-K Block, Sriganganagar 335001 (Raj.).Through Partner Mr. Jitendra Mittal S/o Shri K.c. Mittal, AgedAbout 50 Years.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Union Of India, Through The Secretary, Ministry OfFinance, Income Tax Department, National FacelessAssessment Centre, Delhi.Finance, Income Tax Department, National FacelessAssessment Centre, Delhi.
2. The Ito, Ward-1, Income Tax Department, Sriganganagar(Raj.).(Raj.).
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sanjeev Johari, Sr. Advocate assisted by Mr. Lalit Pariharassisted by Mr. Lalit Parihar
For Respondent(s): --
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR
17/08/2022
Order
Shri Johari frankly concedes that after filing of the writpetition, final assessment order has already been passed andthus, the petitioner would be better advised to avail appropriateremedy there-against.
In view of the submission so made, the instant writ petitionis dismissed as withdrawn.
(KULDEEP MATHUR),J
(SANDEEP MEHTA),J
35-Sudhir Asopa/-
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue