Case LawHigh Court › Garware Wall Ropes Ltd v. Deputy Commiss...

Garware Wall Ropes Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Special Range-26, Mumbai

High Court 15 Oct 2004 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Garware Wall Ropes Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Special Range-26, Mumbai
Date of order
15 Oct 2004
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Garware Wall Ropes Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Special Range-26, Mumbai, the High Court (2004) decided the matter.

Decision: The appeal is dismissed in limine.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORIGINAL SIDE INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.749 OF 2002 Garware Wall Ropes Ltd.vs.Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax,Special Range-26, Mumbai. Appellant Respondent Mr.S.N. Inamdar for the appellant. P.C. CORAM: R. M. LODHA &J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. DATED: 15th October 2004 Heard Mr.S.N. Inamdar, the learned counsel for the appellant. 3. No substantial question of law arises. 4. The appeal is dismissed in limine. (R.M. LODHA,J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan