Gatrumal Kanodia, Son Of Late Madan Lal Kanodia v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
04 Apr 2014 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · patnahcucisdb94
Parties
Gatrumal Kanodia, Son Of Late Madan Lal Kanodia v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
04 Apr 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Gatrumal Kanodia, Son Of Late Madan Lal Kanodia v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2014) decided the matter.
Decision: Petition is, accordingly, disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNACivil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15723 of 2013
======================================================
Gatrumal Kanodia, son of Late Madan Lal Kanodia, R/O Chouk Shikarpur, Patna City, P.S. Chouk, Distt. Patna.
.... .... Petitioner
Versus
1. The Commissioner of Income Tax having its office at 2[nd] Floor Central Revenue Building, Bir Chand Patel Marg, Patna – 1.
2. The Income Tax Officer ( Head Quarter ) Cum CPIO, Income Tax Office at 2[nd] Floor Central Revenue Building, Bir Chand Patel Marg, Patna – 1. 3. The Income Tax Officer Cum CPIO, Ward 4 ( 3 ), Lok Nayak Jai Prakash Bhawan 4[th] Floor, Dak Bunglow Chouraha, Patna.
.... .... Respondents
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner
: Mr. Binod Murari Mishra, Advocate
For the Respondents : Mrs. Archana Sinha, Advocate
Mr. Suman Kumar Mishra, Advocate
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
And
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGHORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)
12 04-04-2014
Having regard to the statements made in the counter
affidavit and the refund of a sum of Rs.12,56,300.00, the grievance of the petitioner stands redressed. The cause of action does not survive.
Petition is, accordingly, disposed of.
(R.M. Doshit, CJ)
Sunil/-
(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.