Gee City Builders P. Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax And Another
High Court
25 May 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Gee City Builders P. Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax And Another
Date of order
25 May 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Gee City Builders P. Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax And Another, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Decision: Appeal is disposed of accordingly, (TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA)JUDGE (PANKAJ JAIN)JUDGE 25.05.2022shwetaWhether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable- Yes/No
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANAAT CHANDIGARHITA-68-2020 (O&M)Date of Decision:25.05.2022
Gee City Builders P. Ltd.
....... Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Income Tax and another
......Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TERJINDER SINGH DHINDSA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN
Present:-Mr. Rajesh Sethi, Advocate, for the appellant,
Mr. Rajesh Katoch, Sr. Standing Counsel withMs. Pridhi Jaswinder Sandhu, Jr. Standing Counsel for respondents-Income lax Deptt.
+++++
TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA J.(Oral)
Since an advance copy of the appeal paper-book has already beenserved upon the respondents, Mr. Rajesh Katoch, learned Senior StandingCounsel has entered appearance on behalf of respondents.
Counsel for the parties are ad idemthat the matter has since beensettled by the appellant with the respondent-authorities.
Mr. Rajesh Sethi, Advocate, for the appellant accordingly makes aStatement that he does not wish to pursue the appeal.
Appeal is disposed of accordingly,
(TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA)JUDGE
(PANKAJ JAIN)JUDGE
25.05.2022shwetaWhether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether reportable- Yes/No
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue