Case LawHigh Court › General Electoral Trust, Mumbai … v. Inc...

General Electoral Trust, Mumbai … v. Income Tax Officer 20(1)(2), Mumbai And Others …

High Court 11 Mar 2016 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
General Electoral Trust, Mumbai … v. Income Tax Officer 20(1)(2), Mumbai And Others …
Date of order
11 Mar 2016
Assessment year(s)
2008-09
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In General Electoral Trust, Mumbai … v. Income Tax Officer 20(1)(2), Mumbai And Others …, the High Court (2016) decided the matter.

Decision: 5.The Petition is disposed of in the above terms.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (L) NO.273 OF 2016 General Electoral Trust, Mumbai … Petitioner v/sIncome Tax Officer 20(1)(2),Mumbai and others … Respondents Mr J.D. Mistry, Sr. Counsel with Mr Madhur Agarwal i/b Mr Atul Jasani for Petitioner. Mr Suresh Kumar with Ms Samiksha Kanani for Respondents. CORAM: M.S. SANKLECHA AND B.P. COLABAWALLA JJ. DATE : 11TH MARCH, 2016 P.C.:- 1. Rule, returnable forthwith. Respondents waive service. At the request of the learned counsel, the Petition is taken up for final disposal. 2.It is an admitted position between the parties that the reasons in support of the impugned notice as furnished to the Petitioner were different from the reasons for which the sanction was received from the Joint Commissioner of Income WPL273.16 Tax on 31[st] March 2015. This is evident from Exh.2 annexed to the affidavit in reply dated 19[th] February 2016 filed by the Assessing Officer when compared with the reasons as annexed at Exh.G to the Petition which was communicated to the Petitioner. 3.In the above view of the matter, the impugned order disposing of the objections of the Petitioner are set aside. The Assessing Officer would furnish to the Petitioner the reasons in support of the impugned notice which had been sanctioned by the Joint Commissioner of Income Tax on 31[st] March 2015 within a period of two weeks from today. On receipt of the sanctioned reasons in support of the impugned notice, the Respondents would, if they so desire, file their objections within one week of it being served upon them. If objections as above are filed, the Assessing Officer shall dispose of the objections within a further period of 3 weeks. In the event the Assessing Officer rejects the objections, he will not proceed with / commence reassessment proceedings for a period of four weeks from the date of the service of the order rejecting of the objections. 4.Subject to the above, the assessment proceedings in the case of the petitioner for Assessment Year 2008-09 are stayed for a period of twelve weeks from today. It is made clear that the period of four weeks during which no reassessment proceedings would be commenced after service of the order rejecting the objections is also factored in while computing the period of twelve weeks from today. This exclusion of time is being provided so that the proposed reassessment proceedings do not become time barred by virtue of section 153(2) of the Act. 5.The Petition is disposed of in the above terms. No order as to costs. (B.P.COLABAWALLA, J.) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan