Gh Raisoni Foundation v. Resoondent

THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPURB8ncKM,C,C, No.J3T^^^D ®n8l8'APPLICANT:^G.H.RaisoniFoundationPetitionerJinkushalCampus,Near SadarRiceIVIill,Mowa,Raipur(CG)through Shri H. Sankalecha, S/oP.Sankalecha,aged about 36Executive Member,G.H.years,RaisoniFoundation,JinkushalCampus,Near Sadar Rice Mill,^^''^.-•••"^^e'^ .^"f.//...""' ^Mowa, Raipur (CG)'0^°-Versus-^ESPONDENT:Commissioner ofIncomeTaxNewCentraiRevenueBuilding, Civil Lines, Raipur (CG)APBiriCATION FOR RESTORATJON OF WRIT PETITION (T).N0^516/2011 DISMISSED ON^fOth MAY, 20J1 FOR WANT OFPROSECUTION c / ^ Bini HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DB:- Hontble Shri Justice T.P. Sharma &Hon'ble Shri Justice C.B. Baioai M.C.C.No.390of2013 Applicant GH Raisoni Foundation Versus Resoondent Chief Commissioner of Income Tax AooUcation for restoration ofWP(Tt No.1516/11 Appearance:Shri Neelabh Dubey, counsel for the applicant.Shri Adil Minhaj, counsc? ^br the respondent.Shri Adil Minhaj, counsc? ^br the respondent. ORDER (Passed on 30th June, 2014| T.P. Sharina. J:- By this petition, the applicant/petitioner has prayed forrestoration of WP(T) No. 1516/11 which was dismissed for wantof prosecution vide order dated 10.5.2011 by learned SingleJudge. 2.The petition has been filed after 103 days ofits limitation.3.Heard on IA No.l,application for c.udonation of delay infiling the restoration petition. 4.On due consideration, IA No.Ol is allowed and delay infiling the restoration petition is hereby condoned. 5.Also heard on restoration petition. 6.On due consideration, the restoration petition is allowed andWP(T)No. 1516/11, which was dismissed for want of prosecution on10.5.11 by leamed Single Judge is hereby restored to its originalnumber. No order as to cost.Sd/-T.P. SharmaJudge C. B.[Bajpai]Judge V