In Ghanshyam A Pandit v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2001) decided the matter.
Issue: Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO ------------------------------------------------------------- GHANSHYAM A PANDIT Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 113 of 1986
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE
and
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA
============================================================
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO ------------------------------------------------------------- GHANSHYAM A PANDIT
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. INCOME TAX REFERENCE No. 113 of 1986 MR KG PANDIT for Petitioner No. 1 MR MANISH R BHATT for Respondent No. 1
--------------------------------------------------------------
CORAM : MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE
and
MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA
Date of decision: 12/07/2001
(Per : MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE)
1.�Learned advocate Shri Bharat Naik has appeared
for the revenue and learned advocate Shri K.G. Pandit
has appeared for the applicant.
2.�Learned advocate Shri J.P. Shah appearing with learned advocate Shri K.G. Pandit has submitted at the time of hearing of this reference that the assessee had settled the dispute by availing benefit under Kar Vivad Samadhan Yojna, 1998. In the circumstances, legal heirs of the assessee do not desire to press this reference.
�The reference is returned unanswered with no
order as to costs.
12.7.2001.����(A.R. Dave, J.)
�����(D.A. Mehta, J.)
/phalguni/
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.