Case LawHigh Court › Ghanshyam Dungarbhai Sutariya v. Assista...

Ghanshyam Dungarbhai Sutariya v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-8, Surat

High Court 28 Jan 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Ghanshyam Dungarbhai Sutariya v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-8, Surat
Date of order
28 Jan 2021
Assessment year(s)
2009-10
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Ghanshyam Dungarbhai Sutariya v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-8, Surat, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.

Decision: In view of the aforesaid statement made by the learned Counsel appearing for the appellant, this tax appeal stands disposed of as not pressed without expressing any opinion on the substantial questions of law. learned Counsel appearing for the appellant, this tax appeal stands disposed of as not pre...

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/TAX APPEAL NO. 249 of 2020 With CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR STAY) NO. 1 of 2020 In R/TAX APPEAL NO. 249 of 2020 ========================================================== GHANSHYAM DUNGARBHAI SUTARIYA Versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-8, SURAT ========================================================== Appearance: VIKAS V NAIR(7444) for the Appellant(s) No. 1MRS KALPANAK RAVAL(1046) for the Opponent(s) No. 1,2========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALAand HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ILESH J. VORA Date : 28/01/2021 ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA) 1. We have heard Mr. Vikas V. Nair, the learned Counsel appearing for the appellant (assessee) and Mrs. Kalpana Raval, the learned Sr. Standing Counsel appearing for the Revenue.Counsel appearing for the appellant (assessee) and Mrs. Kalpana Raval, the learned Sr. Standing Counsel appearing for the Revenue. 2. Mr. Vikas V. Nair, the learned counsel appearing for the appellant has instructions from his client not to press this tax appeal as his client would like to avail the benefit under the “Vivaad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020” for the A.Y. 2009-10. The client of Mr. Nair has informed him that he has received Form-3 from the Designated Authority. C/TAXAP/249/2020 ORDER 3. In view of the aforesaid statement made by the learned Counsel appearing for the appellant, this tax appeal stands disposed of as not pressed without expressing any opinion on the substantial questions of law. learned Counsel appearing for the appellant, this tax appeal stands disposed of as not pressed without expressing any opinion on the substantial questions of law. 4. Civil Application (for stay) also stands disposed of. disposed of. (J. B. PARDIWALA, J) SUCHIT (ILESH J. VORA,J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan