Ghulam Mohd. Bhat ….Petitioner(S)/Appellant(S v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax Jammu
High Court
19 Feb 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · jammuhc
Parties
Ghulam Mohd. Bhat ….Petitioner(S)/Appellant(S v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax Jammu
Date of order
19 Feb 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Ghulam Mohd. Bhat ….Petitioner(S)/Appellant(S v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax Jammu, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
Sr. No. 4
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CONIT No. 1/2018
Ghulam Mohd. Bhat ….Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s)
Through :- Mr. Firdous A. Mir, Advocate
V/s
The Commissioner of Income Tax Jammu
….Respondent(s)
Through :- Mr. Suraj Singh Wazir, Advocate
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE TASHI RABSTAN, JUDGE CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PUNEET GUPTA, JUDGE
ORDER
19.02.2024
Learned counsel for the respondent submits that the nomenclature has
been changed and now instead of Commissioner of Income Tax, there is Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, therefore, objections to the application seeking condonation of delay could not be filed.
Despite last and final opportunity, response to the condonation of delay application has not been filed by the respondent. Therefore, this Court is left with no other option but to condone the delay in filing the review petition. Accordingly, delay of 90 days in filing the review petition is condoned.
Application stands disposed of.
Registry is directed to diarize the accompanying review petition.
Notice in the review petition. Mr. Suraj Singh Wazir, learned counsel waives notice on behalf of respondent.
List the review petition on 27.03.2024.
Registry is directed to reflect the name of Mr. Suraj Singh Wazir, Advocate as counsel for the respondent in the cause list.
Jammu: 19.02.2024Pawan Angotra
(Puneet Gupta) Judge
(Tashi Rabstan) Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.