Case LawHigh Court › Gitesh G. Mundhra, Jalgaon v. The Income...

Gitesh G. Mundhra, Jalgaon v. The Income Tax Officer, Jalgaon

High Court 18 Dec 2017 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcaurdb
Parties
Gitesh G. Mundhra, Jalgaon v. The Income Tax Officer, Jalgaon
Date of order
18 Dec 2017
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Gitesh G. Mundhra, Jalgaon v. The Income Tax Officer, Jalgaon, the High Court (2017) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABADCIVIL APPLICATION NO. 15947 of 2015 IN INCOME-TAX APPEAL (STAMP) NO. 33017 OF 2015 Gitesh G. Mundhra, Jalgaon. ..APPLICANT VERSUS The Income Tax Officer, Jalgaon ...RESPONDENT Mr Kalyan Patil, Adv., holding for Mr Abhay Kolte, Adv. for applicant CORAM: PRASANNA B. VARALE, AND SUNIL K. KOTWAL, JJ. DATE : 18[th] December 2017 ORAL ORDER : Heard Mr Kalyan Patil, learned Advocate, holding for Mr Kolte, Advocate for applicant. The applicant prays for condonation of delay of 44 days, caused in filing appeal. The applicant has raised substantial grounds in the appeal and though the appellant/applicant wanted to file appeal as early as possible but for his ill-health, the applicant/appellant could not file appeal within stipulated period. It is submitted that applicant was suffering from herpes and he was advised to take complete rest. In view of the submissions of learned Counsel for the applicant as well as for the reasons stated in the application, more particularly, in paragraph No. 6, this application is allowed. Delay caused in filing the appeal is condoned. Post the appeal for Admission on 22[nd] January 2018. ( SUNIL K. KOTWAL ) JUDGE. Madkar ( PRASANNA B. VARALE ) JUDGE.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan