Godrej Industries Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
13 Feb 2007 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Godrej Industries Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
13 Feb 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Godrej Industries Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2007) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Appeal is therefore allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.531 OF 2004
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.531 OF 2004
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.531 OF 2004
IN
I.T.APPEAL NO.658 & 659/MUMBAI/1999
Godrej Industries Ltd. .. Appellants
V/s
Commissioner of Income Tax
Mumbai City X, Mumbai .. Respondent
Ms.Samidha Vedpathak i/by M/s.Maneksha & Sethna for the
Appellants.
CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATE : 13th February, 2007.
P.C.:
P.C.:
1. Heard the learned Counsel for the Appellants. The
learned Counsel for the Appellants states that the issue
raised in this Appeal is clearly covered by the Judgment
of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Britania
Industries Ltd V/s.Commissioner of Income Tax & Another
Industries Ltd V/s.Commissioner of Income Tax & Another- (2005) 278 ITR 546 (SC), against the Assessee. In
- (2005) 278 ITR 546 (SC),
view thereof, the learned Counsel for the Appellant
seeks leave to withdraw this Appeal. Appeal is
therefore allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue