Case LawHigh Court › Godrej Industries Ltd v. Commissioner Of...

Godrej Industries Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 24 Jul 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Godrej Industries Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
24 Jul 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Godrej Industries Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Appeal is therefore allowed to be withdrawn and stands dismissed as such.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.589 OF 2003 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.589 OF 2003 Godrej Industries Ltd. .. Appellant Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax .. Respondent Ms.Samidha Vedpathak i/by M/s.Maneksha & Sethna for the Appellant. Mr.J.S.Saluja for the Respondent. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ. DATE : 24th July, 2008 P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. The learned Counsel for the Respondent seeks leave to withdraw this Appeal. Appeal is therefore allowed to be withdrawn and stands dismissed as such. Permissible Court fees be refunded to the Appellant as per the rules. (S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan