Case LawHigh Court › Gopal Krishan Verma v. State Of Uttarakh...

Gopal Krishan Verma v. State Of Uttarakhand And Two Others

High Court 07 May 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · ukhcucis_pg
Parties
Gopal Krishan Verma v. State Of Uttarakhand And Two Others
Date of order
07 May 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Gopal Krishan Verma v. State Of Uttarakhand And Two Others, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.

Decision: With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed All pending applications stand disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 773 of 2008 (M/S) Gopal Krishan Verma, S/O Late K.C.Verma, R/O Himant Kunj,Near Income Tax Office Mallital, Nainital. …… Petitioner. Versus State of Uttarakhand and two others. … Respondents. Sri H.M.Bhatia holding brief of Sri Arvind Vashist, learned counsel for the petitioner. Sri K.P.Upadhyay, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. Date May 07, 2008. Hon’ble B.S.Verma, J. Heard Sri H.M.Bhatia, Advocate, holding brief of Sri Arvind Vashist, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri K.P.Upadhyay, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents and perused the record. This writ petition has been filed to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no.2 to issue arm licence applied by the petitioner. The grievance of the petitioner is that the application of petitioner for grant of arm licence is pending for disposal since 1-6-2007 before the respondent no.2. In the course of arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner has urged that the ends of justice would be subserved if the Collector is directed to decide the application of the petitioner for grant of arm licence within a time bound period. Prayer is innocuous. The Collector/District Magistrate, Nainital is directed to decide the application moved by the petitioner for issue of arm licence (Annexure No.1) expeditiously, preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order, if there is no legal impediment. of finally. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed All pending applications stand disposed of. RCP ( B.S.Verma, J. )
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan